I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
2024年12月25日 星期三 新京报
。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
Artificial intelligence
The report from OpenAI “clearly demonstrates the way that China is actively employing AI tools to enhance information operations,” Michael Horowitz, a former Pentagon official focused on emerging technologies, told CNN.
这些年，为孤残困难家庭花了多少钱，老马自己也算不清。在马怀龙的带动下，他的妻子、女儿、同事，社会工作者、社会爱心人士，以及那些曾经受到帮扶的人，主动和马怀龙一起照顾辖区孤寡老人、帮扶困难群众。如今，“马怀龙金盾志愿服务队”队员已达380余名，来自各行各业。